A Little Background
In 1998 I spent time training with Jim and Phyllis Dobbs. They tended to use a lot of continuous at that time and were very much involved with the gundog and working dog forms of training. They are great people and taught me a strong foundation which I will always appreciate. When I returned from them I began to play with my Tri-Tronics 500 and found that momentary gave me a lot of quick touches' that provided many advantages for my own training approaches that had developed over many years without the collar. I could use the collar to achieve many things I did with my voice or a leash – in fact I could do even more and I realized what a versatile tool it was.
Once
introduced to the collar and familiar with the feel, I found momentary
or with some dogs a tap of continuous to be very effective without
creating a drop in motivation or a substantial increase in stress. This
pleased me as it was something I was very concerned about and resisted
using the e-collar within my training for this reason. I did not see
the e-collar however as a magic tool but as a catalyst, a way to
progress my training methods more effectively.
|
 | There are a few things I have been taught by the old masters many years ago and these we should never overlook.
– Put the dog in a position where it does what you require without even knowing it
sometimes. Manage the situation so that he can only do what you want.
– Guide him into what you require, show him and help him to succeed. (One of my big criticisms of clicker training is exponents often leave the dog to figure it out for himself. Sometimes creating real mental stress.)
– Know when the dog is trying but getting it wrong and help him get it right.
– Make training a pleasure for the dog and yourself – If you cannot put the dog right or cannot correct at the right time and show him what is the right thing to do. Ignore the behavior. Then set up the situation where you can do it right.
– If you correct a dog, show him immediately afterwards what is right and then praise or reward in some way.
For me the e-collar is a tool which helps me with a methodology, philosophy and approach It enables me to communicate more clearly to a dog. I have developed over the years and am still developing. It is not an end in itself. E-Touch is not a magic method it is a catalyst which you can incorporate within your own training approaches to train even better. Whether you are a foodie, a clickerite, a Koehler based trainer, a redneck gundog (dummy) trainer (like me at times) or whatever, the e-collar is a tool that can be added to the mixture to create something special. BUT the main principles of good training do not disappear, we stay creative, we do not depend on the e-collar for everything, there is no one best approach, it is not a race to see who can train the fastest. And most of all we work within the temperament and pace of the dog – reading the dog and maintaining a true companion relationship is essential. I have to say although I do gundog competitions and want precision stuff I want a dog that will be a dog, will make decisions, and basically acts as a dog while remaining my partner.
Although I originally started off using the collar in gun dog work, I quickly realized the advantages with pet/companion dogs. I also found that by incorporating the collar with `traditional' (whatever that is) approaches I could get good results fairly quickly and pass over the controls to owners. I could also, because I mixed it with leash work, treats, tennis balls, hand manipulation etc that I could use quite low levels for the majority of the time. My main income is now from training using the collar. This was the start of “E-Touch”.
It is difficult to compare and sometimes quite incorrect of us as proponents and teachers of the use of the e-collar to do compare different approaches and methods in case it is taken as highly critical of others. My own feeling is that the collar is a tool that we use in conjunction with our own training approaches. Although there is a technique to using it as there is with a leash and certain other collars, it should not detract from our use of other teaching and training approaches or even other equipment that would help us in our training of any specific dog. Unless you have worked with the other proponents and teachers of the collar it is difficult to come to a conclusion as to what the main differences are. My own thoughts are that it does not matter what others do provided I am confident in the method and approaches I use and they achieve the results with the least possible stress on the dog.
International School for Dog Trainers
Montverde. Florida 407 469 5583
 |